AUC Decision 22406-D01-2017, June 9, 2017, cost ruling: 

56. The Commission finds that the [Veritas] drone video evidence was pertinent to the [landowners’] issues and depicted the proposed transmission line in relation to his property, house, wetlands on and nearby his property in a medium and perspective that assisted the panel in understanding exactly why he was concerned with the location of the transmission line. The Commission finds that in this case, it was more effective to view the aerial video than follow a witness’ verbal, written, still photographic or mapping evidence of distances, location and size of impacted land features.

DRONE VIDEO EVIDENCE 

POST-PRODUCTION TECHNIQUES

SAFE.

INSURED. 

COMPLIANT.

EXPERIENCED.

CERTIFIED

REGISTERED

© 2019 Veritas Litigation Support

  • Twitter Social Icon